Many have been asking to view the Arri RAW / Pro Res comparisons. I was really amazed hat how little difference it made to the end result. I was simultaneously recording both 4:4:4:4 LOGc and Arri RAW in the above edit.
The edit is the Pro Res cut, and the second one is the Arri RAW cut. At this level I can’t pick a difference, and I’d be keen to hear if anyone out there can see anything different between them !
We screened these in the new cinemas at SAFC and I felt there was a very slight edge to the Arri RAW in terms of resolution but it was only after after a couple of viewings that I could really pick it.
The dynamic range was the same, and I guess in more difficult lighting conditions, the compression of Pro Res might be an extra complication, but given Acres will be shot day exterior and day interior, I’m not anticipating that will factor here.
As mentioned previously, we decided to not worry about shooting RAW. Shooting Arri RAW in this case is a more expensive exercise because of the additional hire of the recorder, and the huge increase int he amount of data that has to be backed up each day.
As much as the *geek* in me was screaming that it shouldn’t be, I was OK with letting the slight hit in resolution slide, for the sake of getting a smaller package and it meant I could more easily afford the HAWK lens package as well.
Post path here was grade in Lustre @ 2kDPX, render to uncompressed QT, then transcode to h.264.
ProRes 4:4:4:4 is very high level with very little compression. Since the RAW files are larger still, I think you did well to choose the Pro Res way.
This actual test was needed! Thank you! rob stiff
What a strange test – Ive just found it linked from DVX user.
It seems that you are no way exploring what looks the raw file can bring without falling apart ?
ARRI has recently updated their ARRIRAW de-bayering software for even better results!
RAW seems the simpler way
I disagree.
ArriRAW requires an extra external recorder. There’s extra cost for that item PLUS the additional storage. It also has to be powered and further restricts what you can do with the camera in terms of rigging.
As far as I’m concerned, there’s a small advantage in resolution and almost no advantage in terms of grading.
jb
Hi John,
What size was the screen you projected on to? Was it a screening room or a cinema? What size image did you project, 2K 1080p, etc? I have a project coming up and I’d like to shoot arri raw but an afraid it will be out of the budget. Thanks for any and all input.
AM
Hi.
It was a proper cinema at the SAFC studio. I think it can hold over 200 people.
JB.
Thanks, John